| Entidad De Financiamiento | Compromisos |
|---|---|
| Inter-American Development Bank | 30.00 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 30.00 |
Project to Support a Rural Economic Development Program
Resumen*
The Project to Support the Rural Economic Development Program for Guatemala aims for strong indigenous involvement to improve the competitiveness of rural productive supply chains and strengthen the institutional capacity of public entities to adopt a territorial management model. The Project has three components: (1) it improves income, it invests in productive supply chains -- market access, technical assistance, seed capital, financial services... Ver Más
Objetivo de desarrollo
The Project Development Objectives (PDO) are (i) to improve the competitiveness of rural productive supply chains with strong indigenous participation; and (ii) to strengthen the institutional capacity of the public entities participating in the program through the adoption of a territorial management model with indigenous participation.
Llave Detalles
Proyecto Detalles
P094321
Closed
Svetlana Edmeades
Ministry of Finance
28 de julio de 2005
(a partir de la presentación ante el Directorio)
29 de marzo de 2006
6 de marzo de 2007
US$ 60.00 millones
Social Investment Fund (FIS),MINISTRY OF THE ECONOMY (MINECO),Telephony Development Fund (FONDETEL),National Peace Fund (FONAPAZ),Presidential Secretariat for Planning and Programming (SEGEPLAN)
2006
US$ 60.00 millones
B
17 de febrero de 2015
31 de diciembre de 2014
BANK APPROVED
Finanzas
Financiamiento (millones de US$)
Financiamiento total del proyecto (millones de US$)
| Línea de productos | BIRF/AIF |
|---|---|
| Compromiso del BIRF | 30.00 |
| Compromiso de la AIF | No Disponible |
| Compromiso del BIRF + AIF | 30.00 |
| Instrumento de Financiamiento | |
|---|---|
| Monto a título de donación | 30.00 |
| Costo total del proyecto** | 60.00 |
Resumen del financiamiento del Banco Mundial (millones de US$) al 31 de marzo de 2025
No hay datos disponibles.
Actividad financiera detallada al 31 de marzo de 2025
No hay datos disponibles.
Ratings
CALIFICACIONES DE LA EJECUCIÓN
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-11-30 |
| Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-11-30 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2014-11-30 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-11-30 |
| Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-11-30 |
| Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-11-30 |
| Counterpart Funding | Moderately Satisfactory | 2014-11-30 |
CALIFICACIONES DE LA TERMINACIÓN
| INDICADOR | INFORME DE LA TERMINACIÓN DE LA EJECUCIÓN Y DE RESULTADOS: 06-25-2015 |
|---|---|
| Resultados | |
| Riesgo para los resultados de desarrollo | Substantial |
| Desempeño del Banco | |
| Desempeño del prestatario | |
| Desempeño del Gobierno | |
| Organismo Ejecutor |
CALIFICACIONES DE EVALUACIONES INDEPENDIENTES
| INDICADOR | REVISIÓN DEL ICR: 06-23-2016 | INFORME DE LA EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO DEL PROYECTO: |
|---|---|---|
| Calificación De Los Resultados | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Riesgo Para Los Resultados De Desarrollo | Moderate | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Banco | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Prestatario | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Gobierno | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Calidad Del Ife | Satisfactory | N/a |
| Calidad De Sye | Modest | N/a |
Marco de resultados
INDICADORES DE OBJETIVOS DE DESARROLLO DE PROYECTOS
| INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
|---|
Increase of total sales of the rural productive supply chain partnerships with US$35 million during the project period (revised indicator) Valor 0 US$15.4 million US$35 million Fecha 1 de octubre de 2009 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar Reflects sales from 189 sub-projects; only sub-projects were considered (and not plans for capacity strengthening) This target was revised down to US$35 million (from US$50 million) through restructuring in March 2013 At least 25% of municipal projects stem from the participatory planning process (revised indicator) Valor 0.00 35.00 25.00 Fecha 28 de septiembre de 2010 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar This indicator has consistently exceeded the original target value of 5%, which was increased to 25% This target was revised up to 25% (from 5%) through restructuring in March 2013
INDICADORES DE RESULTADOS INTERMEDIOS
| INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
|---|
At least 200 new productive supply chain partnerships reaching at least 30,000 project beneficiaries are operating (revised indicator) Valor 0.00 189.00 200.00 Fecha 26 de noviembre de 2007 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar 13 have been canceled;Direct beneficiaries (17,990) + indirect beneficiaries (89,950) = 107,940 beneficiaries from productivepartnershipsThere are additional 11,316 direct and indirect beneficiaries from business strengthening activities under the project Original target of 300 partnerships was revised down to 200; Number of beneficiaries was also revised down from 45,000 to 30,000,where at least 12,000 are direct and 18,000 are indirect beneficiaries; revised through restructuring in March 2013 80% of project beneficiaries are indigenous (original indicator) Valor 0.00 90.00 80.00 Fecha 26 de noviembre de 2007 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar Target has been surpassed. At least 80% of the technical assistance provided to producer organizations is done so in the prevailing language of the participating producer organization (revised indicator) Valor 0.00 80.00 80.00 Fecha 28 de septiembre de 2010 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar Target has been achieved;revised through restructuring in March 2013 All financed projects have an environmental management tool developed according to the norms of he Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, before their implementation (revised indicator) Valor 0.00 100.00 100.00 Fecha 28 de septiembre de 2010 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar all sub-projects have an env. management tool Target has been achieved;revised through restructuring in March 2013 Sub-project implementation complies with at least 70% of environmental mitigation measures as defined in the business plan (revisedindicator) Valor 0.00 72.00 100.00 Fecha 28 de septiembre de 2010 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar 137 sub-projects complies with 70 to 100% of the mitigation measures (representing 72% of all sub-projects); the rest apply somemitigation measure, but there is no clear progress measure revised through restructuring in March 2013 100% of the beneficiaries of the improvement in rural roads have access during the whole year to critical markets (revised indicators) Valor 0.00 100.00 100.00 Fecha 26 de noviembre de 2007 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar Public access for completed bridges Target has been achieved; Revised through restructuring in March 2013 100% of the productive infrastruture approved by the Investment Coordination Committee (ICC) is implemented according to timing expected in the contract (revised indicator) Valor 0.00 82.00 100.00 Fecha 26 de noviembre de 2007 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar this indicator related to productive infrastructure and not bridges; hence, it captures all sub-projects that include productiveinfrastructure (33); of the 33 with contract, 27 were implemented on time, according to contract Target was revised up to 100% from 90% through restructuring in March 2013 100% of infrastructure investments have a maintenance plan signed by the beneficiaries (revised indicator) Valor 0.00 100.00 100.00 Fecha 26 de noviembre de 2007 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar Notifications of receipt of those plans are in the project archives TTarget has been achieved; Revised through restructuring in March 2013 90% of all municipalities covered by the project have a territorial management plan (revised indicator) Valor 0.00 98.00 90.00 Fecha 26 de noviembre de 2007 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar 90% corresponds to 300; now these exist for 328 municipalities, which is equivalent to 98% Target has been achieved and exceeded. Revised through restructuring in March 2013 The decentralized strategic territorial information management system is operational in 3 departments, and provides service coverage to the remaining departments (revised indicator) Valor 0.00 8.00 3.00 Fecha 26 de noviembre de 2007 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar Operational in 8 departments Target has been achieved and surpassed. Revised through restructuring in March 2013 At least 25% of project ideas identified in the Municipal Development Plans have budget in the POAs of local governments (revised indicator) Valor 0.00 35.00 25.00 Fecha 26 de noviembre de 2007 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar Target has been achieved and surpassed. Revised through restructuring in March 2013 Preparation of half-yearly project monitoring reports within 45 days of the end of each semester and a coordinated annual project plan at least 3 months prior to the beginning of the fiscal year Valor 0.00 10.00 10.00 Fecha 26 de noviembre de 2007 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar 2 per year Target has been achieved. Revised through restructuring in March 2013 At least 33% of departments covered by the project have departmental development plans (revised indicator) Valor 0.00 94.00 33.00 Fecha 10 de noviembre de 2014 31 de julio de 2014 Comentar 33% corresponds to 7 DDPs; now these exist for 20 DDPs, which is equivalent to 94% Target has been achieved and exceeded. Revised through restructuring in March 2013