| Entidad De Financiamiento | Compromisos |
|---|---|
| Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 5.00 |
| Borrower/Recipient | 2.63 |
Protected Areas Consolidation and Administration
Resumen*
The Protected Areas Consolidation and Administration Project for El Salvador aims to improve land tenure security and land transactions by providing efficient, equitable, and accessible land administration services, thereby facilitating better land-related investments and more productive and environmentally sustainable land use. Project components: Component 1) aims to strengthen the NPAS to enable long-term sustainable management. Component 2) aims... Ver Más
Objetivo de desarrollo
The global environmental objective of the proposed project is to conserve El Salvador's globally significantbiodiversitybystrength e ning the national protected areas system and consolidating two priority protected areas.
Llave Detalles
Proyecto Detalles
P092202
Closed
Anna Corsi
N/A
19 de noviembre de 2004
(a partir de la presentación ante el Directorio)
29 de noviembre de 2005
29 de mayo de 2007
US$ 7.63 millones
N/A
2006
US$ 5.00 millones
B
15 de enero de 2013
29 de junio de 2012
BANK APPROVED
Finanzas
Financiamiento (millones de US$)
Financiamiento total del proyecto (millones de US$)
| Línea de productos | BIRF/AIF |
|---|---|
| Compromiso del BIRF | No Disponible |
| Compromiso de la AIF | No Disponible |
| Compromiso del BIRF + AIF | No Disponible |
| Instrumento de Financiamiento | |
|---|---|
| Monto a título de donación | 5.00 |
| Costo total del proyecto** | 7.63 |
Resumen del financiamiento del Banco Mundial (millones de US$) al 31 de marzo de 2025
No hay datos disponibles.
Actividad financiera detallada al 31 de marzo de 2025
No hay datos disponibles.
Ratings
CALIFICACIONES DE LA EJECUCIÓN
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2012-07-09 |
| Summary Global Objective Rating | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-07-09 |
| Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-07-09 |
| Counterpart Funding | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-07-09 |
| Project Management | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-07-09 |
| Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-07-09 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-07-09 |
CALIFICACIONES DE LA TERMINACIÓN
| INDICADOR | INFORME DE LA TERMINACIÓN DE LA EJECUCIÓN Y DE RESULTADOS: 12-30-2012 |
|---|---|
| Resultados | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
| Riesgo para los resultados de desarrollo | Substantial |
| Desempeño del Banco | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
| Desempeño del prestatario | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
| Desempeño del Gobierno | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
| Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
CALIFICACIONES DE EVALUACIONES INDEPENDIENTES
| INDICADOR | REVISIÓN DEL ICR: 10-14-2014 | INFORME DE LA EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO DEL PROYECTO: |
|---|---|---|
| Calificación De Los Resultados | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Riesgo Para Los Resultados De Desarrollo | Significant | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Banco | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Prestatario | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Gobierno | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Calidad Del Ife | Satisfactory | N/a |
| Calidad De Sye | Substantial | N/a |
Marco de resultados
INDICADORES DE OBJETIVOS DE DESARROLLO DE PROYECTOS
| INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
|---|
INDICADORES DE RESULTADOS INTERMEDIOS
| INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
|---|
Completion of a priorization study of the NPAS Valor NPAS consists of estimated 118 protected areas and Study completed Study completed Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar Products delivered include: (1) Work Plan; (2) Preliminary criteria for PAs prioritization; (3) Updated ecosystems map; (4) Rapidecological evaluation report; (5) Final preliminary criteria report; (6) Conservation objects; (7) Preliminary proposed NPASmodels; and (8) Proposed Strategic Lines of Action for NPAS management. Action Plan for implementation of updated NPAS. Valor Preliminary Action Plan exists. Draft Action Plan Updated Action Plan agreed by key stakeholders Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar The draft is being consulted within MARN and with stakeholders at the local level. Delimitation of at least 40 protected areas and mangroves Valor 0 68 terrestrial and 1 marine areas 40 Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar Areas transferred to MARN and declared as protected areas Approved regulations for the implementation of the new Protected Areas Law. Valor Preliminary draft regulations Revised draft Draft regulations approved and in effect Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar PCU team has updated draft regulations based on project results and has submitted draft to MARN for its revision. Draft interinstitutional agreements for operating the NPAS. Valor No clear roles and responsibilities identified Necessary agreements being assessed. Draft agreements consulted and agreed Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar A high level forum has been established between MARN and ISTA for facilitating the exchange of information and expediting theprocess of transfer of potential protected areas. MARN-CNR agreement expires in May 2012. A technical round table has beenestablished toexpedite approval of field work products. Based on the draft updated NPAS strategy, MARN is assessing the requiredinterinstitutional agreements necessary for operating the NPAS. At least 10% of national population aware of new protected areas law and regulations Valor 0 0Baseline survey indicates no knowledge of PAs La At least 10% of national population aware of new p Fecha 1 de septiembre de 2010 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar Baseline survey shows noknowledge of protected areaslaw (only of environmentallaw). Communicationcampaign design developed by the consultancy considered unsatisfactory by MARN. MARN has prepared a newcommunicationcampaign proposal. Socioeconomic census, environmental information, mapped official boundaries, cadastre and registry for each pilot protected area collected and linked with CNR databases. Valor Cadastre and registry information for individual P Socio-economic census and environmental informatio Socio economic census and environmental informatio Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar MARN has also created a Protected Areas Registry, which has not yet been linked with CNR database. Demarcation of pilot PAs (including # of km demarcated of external boundaries of pilot areas, and nuclei). Valor No km demarcated Delineation and physical demarcation of one pilot Esternal boundaries demarcated and nuclei and inte Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar Delineation of second area in process and expected to be completed by end of project. Physical demarcation of second will not beachieved. Percent of pilot area lands with no unresolved tenure issues Valor To be established in YR 1. 90.5% of San Diego La Barra pilot area with no lan Tenure being resolved in both areas Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar Field survey work in the Bahia of Jiquilisco pilot area is expected to be completed by end of project. Ministerial resolutions to establish pilot PAs. Valor PAs not legally established Five areas (pilot area of San Diego La Barra, and Pilot areas legalized and registered Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar The only area that remains to be declared is Normandia. Mangrove areas are protected through the PAs Law (art. 9) and form part ofthe NPAS. MARN is analyzing the appropriate legal mechanism to have mangroves registered in the name of the State. Number of protected area field staff in each pilot PA Valor San Diego La Barra: 6 park rangers and 1 CEPRODE t 5 park rangers in San DiegoLa Barra and 24 parkr Adequacy of number evaluated and revised, if neces Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar Publication of periodic Project reports (FMRs, semestral reports, and annual work plan available). Valor 0 All reports submitted All reports submitted Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar Regular performance and impact monitoring reports produced and disseminated in accordance with annual work plan schedule. Valor 0 M&E reports up to date Reports submitted Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar MTR available and transmitted to the Bank Valor 0 Completed Mid term review completed Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 19 de abril de 2010 30 de junio de 2010 Comentar Updated strategy and action plan for consolidating sustainable national protected areas system developed. Valor No updated strategy and action plan Draft updated strategy and action plan Strategy updated based on project results Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar The draft updated strategy and action plan have been developed but have not been fully consulted. The draft updated strategy and action plan have been developed but have not been fully consulted. Two pilot protected areas consolidated and effectively managed (Tracking tool score of at least 40 for 35,600 ha in Bahia de Jiquilisco and 1,917 ha in Lago Guija Complex San Diego-La Barra) Valor Tracking tool score for Bahia de Jiquilisco: 15 f Bahia de Jiquilisco: Tracking tool score of 39 in Tracking tool score of at least 40 for 35,600 ha i Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar The team is updating the Tracking Tool scores with end of project information. Biodiversity established in at least 12,400 ha-For Bahia de Jiquilisco PA at least 11,000 ha -For Lago Guija Complex San Diego-LaBarra at least 1,400 ha Valor 1,400ha of dry tropical forest in San Diego La Bar March 2009 aerial photos show: 18,424 ha of forest No loss of target habitats Fecha 15 de marzo de 2009 30 de abril de 2012 29 de junio de 2012 Comentar The project is collecting further information and data to refine measurement of forest cover in the two areas. Amount of revenues raised from sustainable natural resources concessions, visitor fees, and other potential cost recovery mechanisms Valor 0.00 0.00 0.00 Fecha 29 de noviembre de 2005 30 de abril de 2012 Comentar To be established in YR1 A mechanism for full cost recovery is not in place; the funding and concession study has not been carried out. The project thoughhas strengthened MARN's institutional capacity for planning for long-term expenditures necessary (both human and financial) tosustain the system and evaluating alternative financing sourcesa mechanism for full cost recovery is not in place, the project hasstrengthened MARN's institutional capacity for planning for long-term expenditures necessary (both human and financial) to sustainthe system and evaluating alternative financing sources.