| Entidad De Financiamiento | Compromisos |
|---|---|
| Borrower/Recipient | 20.46 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 64.00 |
Manila Third Sewerage Project
Resumen*
The Manila Third Sewerage Project aims to: (a) increase the coverage and effectiveness of sewerage service delivery in participating areas of Metro Manila through an integrated approach involving septage management, sewage management, and heightened consumer awareness of water pollution problems and their solutions; and, (b) establish the financial and technical viability of new approaches for sewage management in Metro Manila (MM). The project has... Ver Más
Objetivo de desarrollo
The development objectives of the Manila Third Sewerage Project are to: (a) increase the coverage and effectiveness of sewerage service delivery in participating areas of Metro Manila through an integrated approach involving septage management, sewage management,and heightened consumer awareness of water pollution problems and their solutions; and, (b) establish the financial and technical viability of new approaches for sewage management in MM.
Llave Detalles
Proyecto Detalles
P079661
Closed
Christopher Ancheta
N/A
21 de noviembre de 2003
(a partir de la presentación ante el Directorio)
21 de junio de 2005
6 de marzo de 2006
US$ 84.46 millones
N/A
2005
US$ 64.00 millones
A
No aplicable
30 de junio de 2012
BANK APPROVED
15 de enero de 2013
Finanzas
Financiamiento (millones de US$)
Financiamiento total del proyecto (millones de US$)
| Línea de productos | BIRF/AIF |
|---|---|
| Compromiso del BIRF | 64.00 |
| Compromiso de la AIF | No Disponible |
| Compromiso del BIRF + AIF | 64.00 |
| Instrumento de Financiamiento | |
|---|---|
| Monto a título de donación | No Disponible |
| Costo total del proyecto** | 84.46 |
Resumen del financiamiento del Banco Mundial (millones de US$) al 31 de julio de 2025
No hay datos disponibles.
Actividad financiera detallada al 31 de julio de 2025
No hay datos disponibles.
Ratings
CALIFICACIONES DE LA EJECUCIÓN
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-08-07 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-08-07 |
| Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-08-07 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-08-07 |
| Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2012-08-07 |
| Procurement | Satisfactory | 2012-08-07 |
| Project Management | Satisfactory | 2012-08-07 |
CALIFICACIONES DE LA TERMINACIÓN
| INDICADOR | INFORME DE LA TERMINACIÓN DE LA EJECUCIÓN Y DE RESULTADOS: 12-27-2012 |
|---|---|
| Resultados | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Riesgo para los resultados de desarrollo | Modest |
| Desempeño del Banco | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Desempeño del prestatario | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Desempeño del Gobierno | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Satisfactory |
CALIFICACIONES DE EVALUACIONES INDEPENDIENTES
| INDICADOR | REVISIÓN DEL ICR: 03-12-2015 | INFORME DE LA EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO DEL PROYECTO: |
|---|---|---|
| Calificación De Los Resultados | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Riesgo Para Los Resultados De Desarrollo | Moderate | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Banco | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Prestatario | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Gobierno | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Calidad Del Ife | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Calidad De Sye | Negligible | N/a |
Marco de resultados
INDICADORES DE OBJETIVOS DE DESARROLLO DE PROYECTOS
| INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
|---|
Increase in satisfaction of residents w/sewerage/sanitation service delivery in participating areas including health incidences of diarrhea. Valor none provided Yes Annual increases starting Yr 3 through Yr 6. Fecha 21 de junio de 2005 31 de diciembre de 2011 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar No baseline data was provided in the PAD and Project Agreement. In Dec 2008, a 6% decline in diarrhea incidents per person wasrecorded. No value was indicated in the Results Framework Monitoring because there is no uniform metrics to measure the increase/decrease insatisfaction (e.g. not all respondents on survey are from the MTSP catchments. DOH figures on diarrhea are not confined within theEast Concession area only. (Have requested MWCI to justify in the ICR) No end target stated in the PAD and Project Agreement. Just indicate "Yes" if there is an increase starting year 3. If thesatisfaction rate of the residents increased, this translates to improved services including decreased incidences of diarrhea. Total BOD removed by the project (tons/year). Valor 5,600 206,372 20,400 Fecha 30 de junio de 2005 31 de diciembre de 2011 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar The baseline was based on the existing treatment plants prior to the project. The actual figure represents an overachievement by 900%. Comulative figures includes both septage and sewage treatment plantsunder an expanded service area of intercepted combined flows. (We are verifying this figure with MWCI to account for the hugeoverachievement and have requested to justify in the ICR.) The target for the original closing date in June 2010 is 20,400. This was not revised in the restructuring. (This target wasbasedon the assumption that the BOD volume removed is from the connected Households to the sewer network.) Percent increase in take-up rate of desludging service (% take-up rate/yr). Valor none provided Yes Annually Yr 3 - Yr 6 Fecha 30 de junio de 2005 31 de diciembre de 2011 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar No baseline provided in the PAD and Project Agreement. Based on earlier data, the number of septic tanks desludged in MWCI areasincreased by 42% from 2005 to 2006. No quantification in PAD for this indicator, simply indicates yes or no if there is an increase. However, we can see this in thenumber of tanks desludged, which increased by 6% from 826,870 in 2010 to 879,017 in 2011. No target indicated in the PAD and Project Agreement. Number of sewage treatment plants treating combined flows in a sustainable manner that comply with relevant discharge standards. Valor 0 6 8 Fecha 30 de junio de 2005 31 de diciembre de 2011 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Underachievement is due to cancellation of Taguig subprojects. Target was downgraded from 9 to 8 in the restructuring of the project. In the course of implementation, the original 8 was reducedto 7 as the Taguig subproject warranted an STP with a sewer network. Cost of operation is in an acceptable range. Valor 0 20% around 20% Fecha 30 de junio de 2005 31 de diciembre de 2011 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar The cost of operation of the completed projects is within the range at no more than 20%. Target of 20% starts at year 3. Values are confidential. Hence, the target is only a range.
INDICADORES DE RESULTADOS INTERMEDIOS
| INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
|---|
Sewage management. Number of water connections in MWCI service area with sewage treatment service (cumulative # by end of yr). Valor 46,350 102,835 49,500 Fecha 1 de enero de 2004 31 de diciembre de 2010 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar There was an overachievement of the target. Note however, the target was reduced during the restructuring of the project. Target was downgraded to 49,500 from 117,000 during the restructuring of the project Volume of sewage treated before disposal (cum. 1000 m3/yr). Valor 7,026 111,345 113,227 Fecha 1 de enero de 2004 31 de diciembre de 2010 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Latest actual figures are witihn reach of the target. It will reach its target by project close in June 2012. This figure is the original target for June 30, 2010. This was not revised in the restructuring. Length of drainage lines installed/rehabilitated (cum. km by end of yr). Valor 0 0 21 Fecha 1 de enero de 2004 31 de diciembre de 2010 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar In the PAD, this was noted as subject to verification of surveyed length of drainage lines requiring rehabilitation. The figure is still to be discussed by MWCI. The drainage lines are the responsibility of the local government units, hence,passing on the CAPEX to the concessionaire would mean an increase in the tariff that will be passed on to the consumers. Thescaled down figure was included in areas where there is a necessity for the linkages of the conveyance of wastewater to the STP.One of the candidate sub-projects that may include such activity is the proposed Taguig sewer system. Target was scaled down to 21 from 120 during the restructuring to cater to the proposed Taguig sewer network. However, the Taguigsubproject was cancelled. Septage Management.Number of septic tanks desludged in MWCI service area (cum. # by end of yr). Valor 17,000 826,870 250,560 Fecha 1 de enero de 2004 31 de diciembre de 2010 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Target was overachieved even surpassing the end of project target. Volume of septage treated before disposal (cumulative m3 by end of yr). Valor 0 1,008,740 982,800 Fecha 1 de enero de 2004 31 de diciembre de 2010 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Project end target already achieved Percentage of BOD reduction in the septic tanks in a sample not smaller than 0.5% year (%average reduction). Valor around 10% 20% around 20% Fecha 1 de enero de 2004 31 de diciembre de 2010 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Baseline studies were done in 2008. 20% is reached. No quantification in the PAD for this indicator. The 20% is the target at project end. Institutional Strengthening.Number of people reached by public information campaign (% average reduction). Valor 0 1,508,097 957,090 Fecha 1 de enero de 2004 31 de diciembre de 2011 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Indicator already achieved the year-end target. Percent increase in take-up rate of deslugding services (% take-up rate/yr.). Valor 0 Yes Yes Fecha 1 de enero de 2004 31 de diciembre de 2011 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar No quantification in the PAD and Project Agreement. In Dec. 2008, the percent increase in take up rate of desludging services was14.5%. No quantification in PAD for this indicator, simply indicates yes or no if there is an increase. However, we can see this in thenumber of tanks desludged, which increased by 6% from 826,870 in 2010 to 879,017 in 2011. No quantification in the PAD and Project Agreement. Prepared follow up wastewater and sanitation programs. Valor 0 Yes Follow-up program(s) prepared Fecha 1 de enero de 2004 31 de diciembre de 2011 30 de junio de 2011 Comentar No quantification in the PAD and Project Agreement. MWCI has already prepared FS for the Marikina river and has started implementation in three catchments already. A follow-up loan,the Metro Manila Wastewater Project has been approved by the Bank. No quantification in PAD and project Agreement.