Entidad De Financiamiento | Compromisos |
---|---|
Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 17.00 |
Borrower/Recipient | 16.32 |
P075035
Closed
Liping Jiang
N/A
6 de septiembre de 2002
(a partir de la presentación ante el Directorio)
15 de abril de 2004
22 de septiembre de 2004
US$ 33.32 millones
N/A
2004
US$ 17.00 millones
C
15 de enero de 2013
30 de junio de 2011
BANK APPROVED
Entidad De Financiamiento | Compromisos |
---|---|
Global Environment Facility (GEF) | 17.00 |
Borrower/Recipient | 16.32 |
Línea de productos | BIRF/AIF |
---|---|
Compromiso del BIRF | No Disponible |
Compromiso de la AIF | No Disponible |
Compromiso del BIRF + AIF | No Disponible |
Instrumento de Financiamiento | |
---|---|
Monto a título de donación | 17.00 |
Costo total del proyecto** | 33.32 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Procurement | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Summary Global Objective Rating | Highly Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Overall | Low | 2011-06-20 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Project Management | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-06-20 |
INDICADOR | INFORME DE LA TERMINACIÓN DE LA EJECUCIÓN Y DE RESULTADOS: 12-27-2011 |
---|---|
Resultados | Highly Satisfactory |
Riesgo para los resultados de desarrollo | Negligible |
Desempeño del Banco | Substantial |
Desempeño del prestatario | Highly Satisfactory |
Desempeño del Gobierno | Highly Satisfactory |
Organismo Ejecutor | Highly Satisfactory |
INDICADOR | REVISIÓN DEL ICR: 05-13-2013 | INFORME DE LA EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO DEL PROYECTO: 06-19-2015 |
---|---|---|
Calificación De Los Resultados | Moderately Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
Riesgo Para Los Resultados De Desarrollo | Negligible To Low | Substantial |
Desempeño Del Banco | Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
Desempeño Del Prestatario | Moderately Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
Desempeño Del Gobierno | Moderately Satisfactory | Not Rated |
Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Satisfactory | Satisfactory |
Calidad Del Ife | Satisfactory | Not Rated |
Calidad De Sye | Modest | Substantial |
INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
---|
INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
---|
Substantial reduction of pollution loading and groundwater overdraft in the selected counties. | Valor | For the 16 pilot counties: 1. COD:108,372 tons/ye | Substantial reduction in 2009 has been made: 1. C | Pollution loading to the rivers is reduced by 30% |
Fecha | 22 de septiembre de 2004 | 17 de diciembre de 2010 | 30 de junio de 2011 | |
Comentar | The above baseline data were updated based on the final review of the historical data by MEP and MWR. | The above data were based on the M&E data for 2009. The data for 2010 was not available. | The targets were consistent with the PAD. |
Cooperation mechanisms between water departments and environment departments at central, provincial, municipal and county levels have been prepared, updated every year and implemented. | Valor | No cooperation mechanisms were established and imp | The documents on cooperation mechanisms were prepa | Implementation of the cooperation mechanisms betwe |
Fecha | 22 de septiembre de 2004 | 17 de diciembre de 2010 | 30 de junio de 2011 | |
Comentar |
16 IWEMPs for the selected 16 pilot counties, IWEMP for Tianjin, 2 Action Plans for Hai Basin and ZWN sub-basin were prepared and supported by 10 strategic studies, KM/ET and demonstration projects. | Valor | No IWEMPs, Action Plans, Strategic Studies, KM/ET | IWEMPs, Action Plans, Strategic Studies, KM/ET, an | IWEMPs, Action Plans, Strategic Studies, KM/ET, an |
Fecha | 22 de septiembre de 2004 | 17 de diciembre de 2010 | 30 de junio de 2011 | |
Comentar |
Tianjin Coastal Wastewater Management component including Dagu industrial pollution control, Hangu wastewater management with financial incentives is well implemented and produces good impacts. | Valor | The waste water treatment in small towns was not s | Tianjin coastal waste water management component i | Impact of Dagu industrial pollution control was ac |
Fecha | 22 de septiembre de 2004 | 17 de diciembre de 2010 | 30 de junio de 2011 | |
Comentar |