| Entidad De Financiamiento | Compromisos |
|---|---|
| IDA Credit | 25.00 |
| Borrower/Recipient | 6.00 |
| Nordic Development Fund (NDF) | 7.90 |
Land Administration Program
Resumen*
The Land Administration Project development objective aims at an integrated, and decentralized land administration system (comprising public and private entities) to provide users accurate information on urban, and rural land parcels, and effective land administration services (purchase, mortgages, cadastral and registry certifications, etc.) in a timely and cost-effective manner. The system will help increase land tenure security, facilitate land... Ver Más
Objetivo de desarrollo
The project's development objective is: To establish and operate an integrated and decentralized land administration system (composed of public and private entities) which provides users in the project area with accurate information on urban and rural parcels and effective land administration services (e.g., purchases, mortgages, cadastral and registry certifications) in a timely and cost-effective manner
Llave Detalles
Proyecto Detalles
P055991
Closed
Enrique Pantoja
N/A
29 de septiembre de 2000
(a partir de la presentación ante el Directorio)
26 de febrero de 2004
2 de diciembre de 2004
US$ 38.90 millones
N/A
2004
US$ 32.90 millones
B
15 de enero de 2013
30 de abril de 2010
BANK APPROVED
Finanzas
Financiamiento (millones de US$)
Financiamiento total del proyecto (millones de US$)
| Línea de productos | BIRF/AIF |
|---|---|
| Compromiso del BIRF | No Disponible |
| Compromiso de la AIF | 25.00 |
| Compromiso del BIRF + AIF | 25.00 |
| Instrumento de Financiamiento | |
|---|---|
| Monto a título de donación | 7.90 |
| Costo total del proyecto** | 38.90 |
Resumen del financiamiento del Banco Mundial (millones de US$) al 28 de febrero de 2025
No hay datos disponibles.
Actividad financiera detallada al 28 de febrero de 2025
No hay datos disponibles.
Ratings
CALIFICACIONES DE LA EJECUCIÓN
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
| Project Management | Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
| Financial Management | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
| Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
| Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
| Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2010-06-30 |
CALIFICACIONES DE LA TERMINACIÓN
| INDICADOR | INFORME DE LA TERMINACIÓN DE LA EJECUCIÓN Y DE RESULTADOS: 10-25-2010 |
|---|---|
| Resultados | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Riesgo para los resultados de desarrollo | Modest |
| Desempeño del Banco | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Desempeño del prestatario | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Desempeño del Gobierno | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
CALIFICACIONES DE EVALUACIONES INDEPENDIENTES
| INDICADOR | REVISIÓN DEL ICR: 05-02-2012 | INFORME DE LA EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO DEL PROYECTO: |
|---|---|---|
| Calificación De Los Resultados | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Riesgo Para Los Resultados De Desarrollo | Moderate | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Banco | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Prestatario | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Gobierno | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Calidad Del Ife | Satisfactory | N/a |
| Calidad De Sye | Modest | N/a |
Marco de resultados
INDICADORES DE OBJETIVOS DE DESARROLLO DE PROYECTOS
| INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
|---|
Average time to register a land transaction (days) Valor 90 days or more 23 days 7 Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar Estimated at Credit closing date (to be confirmed after final evaluation is completed). Original target date of 7 days wasunrealistic, considering worldwide tr ends. In general, the reduction in thetime to register a land transaction, from an average of 90 days at thebeggining of the project to 23 days puts Honduras ahead of many countries inthe region (as corroborated by Doing Business Indicat ors). Average administrative cost of registering a land transaction Valor $6.21 US$14.96 $2.07 Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar Estimated at Credit closing date (to be confirmed after final evaluation is completed). Baseline is unreliable due to unkownmethodology and poor data. Moreove r, measurement of this indicator still faceslimitations due to IP's accounting methods. Registry (now under Property Institute) is self-financed (percent of Registry's operating costs covered by registration fees) Valor 0 100% 100% Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar Estimated at Credit Closing Date (to be confirmed after final evaluation is completed). Rating of SINAP services (percentage of users--and % of women-- rating its services as "satisfactory", a third level on a four-level scale) Valor 0 67% total (68% by female users) 70% Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar Estimated at Credit Closing Date (to be confirmed after final evaluation is completed). The System maintains a 96% rate of titled lands accurately registered in SINAP Valor 0 89% 96% Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar Estimated at Credit Closing Date (to be confirmed after final evaluation is completed).
INDICADORES DE RESULTADOS INTERMEDIOS
| INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
|---|
Number of access/connection points to SINAP established in public and private entities Valor 0 690 60 Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar Target of 60 amply exceeded. Number of registries (now under Property Institute) operating SURE under folio real Valor 0 6 8 Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar In addition, the project has provided technical assistance for the modernization of 2 additional registries (Islas de la Bahia andYoro/Olanchito). Number of people certified to operate SINAP subsystems Valor 0 1260 600 Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar Target amply exceeded. Percentage of land parcels in project area registered in SINAP under folio real Valor 0 14% 30% Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar A total of 223,500 properties under folio real Number of parcels in the project area surveyed Valor 0 364238 521,500 Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar 70% of target achieved Number of municipalities demarcated Valor 0 28 (and 1,500 Km of inter-municipal limits defined 25 (and 1,352 Km of inter-municipal limits defined Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar Number of ethnic communities demarcated, and number registered in SURE Valor 0 (0) 20 pilot Miskito communities delimited by the Proj 12 (8) Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar New Government has restarted process to provide collective title to pilot Miskito communities. Number of protected areas demarcated Valor 8 2 8 Fecha 2 de diciembre de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar Two protected areas completely demarcated (Jardin Botanico y Centro de Investigacion and Monumento Nacional San Fernando de Omoa).Four protected areas delimite d and ready for demarcation. Percentage of parcels incorporated in SINAP with a woman as main owner Valor 0 45% Not target established Fecha 24 de octubre de 2007 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar 142,948 parcels registered in SINAP with a woman as main owner. 40% of land transactions in the project area are registered in SINAP under folio real Valor 0 41% 40% Fecha 12 de febrero de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar 12,000 land parcels surveyed within national forest areas Valor 0 44424 12,000 Fecha 12 de febrero de 2004 30 de abril de 2010 30 de abril de 2010 Comentar Target amply exceeded.