Entidad De Financiamiento | Compromisos |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 166.34 |
Borrower/Recipient | 33.62 |
P052037
Closed
Dean Cira
N/A
4 de enero de 2000
(a partir de la presentación ante el Directorio)
20 de marzo de 2001
3 de febrero de 2002
US$ 199.96 millones
N/A
2001
US$ 166.34 millones
A
No aplicable
30 de junio de 2012
BANK APPROVED
15 de enero de 2013
Entidad De Financiamiento | Compromisos |
---|---|
IDA Credit | 166.34 |
Borrower/Recipient | 33.62 |
Línea de productos | BIRF/AIF |
---|---|
Compromiso del BIRF | No Disponible |
Compromiso de la AIF | 166.34 |
Compromiso del BIRF + AIF | 166.34 |
Instrumento de Financiamiento | |
---|---|
Monto a título de donación | No Disponible |
Costo total del proyecto** | 199.96 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2012-07-08 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-07-08 |
Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-07-08 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-07-08 |
Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-07-08 |
Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-07-08 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-07-08 |
INDICADOR | INFORME DE LA TERMINACIÓN DE LA EJECUCIÓN Y DE RESULTADOS: 12-30-2012 |
---|---|
Resultados | Moderately Satisfactory |
Riesgo para los resultados de desarrollo | Modest |
Desempeño del Banco | Moderately Satisfactory |
Desempeño del prestatario | Moderately Satisfactory |
Desempeño del Gobierno | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDICADOR | REVISIÓN DEL ICR: 08-19-2013 | INFORME DE LA EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO DEL PROYECTO: |
---|---|---|
Calificación De Los Resultados | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Riesgo Para Los Resultados De Desarrollo | Significant | N/a |
Desempeño Del Banco | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Desempeño Del Prestatario | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Desempeño Del Gobierno | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Calidad Del Ife | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Calidad De Sye | Modest | N/a |
INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
---|
Reduction in the number of households affected by two year return period storm | Valor | 0.00 | 96000.00 | 96000.00 |
Fecha | 1 de enero de 2007 | 19 de junio de 2012 | 1 de junio de 2012 | |
Comentar | Changed during restructuring | Data from the Steering Committee for Flood Control indicates reduced flooding in the NLTN catchment area since 2007, despiteincreased rainfall. Over 1.2 million people benefit from the reduced flooding, and thus the target of 96000 households has beenexceeded. | This target has been reached or exceeded based on the overall population of the catchment area. |
Increase in the number of households whose wastewater is collected and disposed of safely | Valor | 0.00 | 200000.00 | 240000.00 |
Fecha | 1 de enero de 2007 | 19 de junio de 2012 | 30 de junio de 2012 | |
Comentar | Changed during restructuring | Estimate is based on actual works progress to date. Actual numbers will be assessed only after the project closing when thesurveyof level three and four sewers is completed. | This is expected to have been reached, but the actual survey will only be completed after project closes. and the survey iscompleted. |
Improvement in the water quality of the NLTN Canal measured by the average level of dissolved oxygen (DO) | Valor | 0.05 | 2.00 | 4.00 |
Fecha | 4 de enero de 2010 | 31 de mayo de 2012 | 30 de junio de 2012 | |
Comentar | Taken at low tide | Low tide average in the NLTN canal was 2.0, already much improved from the baseline. Though this is less than the target value,itshows strong improvement over the baseline. Once operational, this should improve further. | Target is a value of at least 4 measured as Mg/l. Water quality is already much improved from the baseline samples. The resultsindicate the dredging is serving to improve water quality. Once the interceptor is commissioned the water quality is expected toimprove further. The ICR will include further water quality monitoring results. |
Implementation of the agreed tariif schedule by the People's Committee of Ho Chi Minh City | Valor | 250.00 | 450.00 | 450.00 |
Fecha | 1 de enero de 2007 | 26 de octubre de 2011 | 1 de junio de 2012 | |
Comentar | Value is Vietnam Dong (VND) per cubic meterChanged during restructuring | Based on the approved tariff decrees | The actual tariff is now higher than the target of VND450 as the water tariff has continued to increase. The road map to 2015expects to increase the waste water tariff the 15% of the water tariff by 2015. |
INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
---|
KM of wastewater interceptor constructed | Valor | 5.00 | 9.00 | 8.40 |
Fecha | 11 de enero de 2007 | 20 de junio de 2012 | 1 de junio de 2012 | |
Comentar | The interceptor has been 100% completed. | 100% complete. |
KM of combined primary and secondary sewers replaced and constructed. | Valor | 2.00 | 52.00 | 59.50 |
Fecha | 11 de enero de 2007 | 20 de junio de 2012 | 1 de junio de 2012 | |
Comentar | Added as part of 2009 restructuring. | Final amount is less than earlier projection due to design change. But Target is considered met. | Target met as of final mission. |
KM of sheet piles installed for canal embankments | Valor | 1.00 | 16.30 | 18.00 |
Fecha | 11 de enero de 2007 | 20 de junio de 2012 | 1 de junio de 2012 | |
Comentar | Added at restructuring in 2009. | The canal improve was complete at time of last mission. Design changes resulted in fewer KM of piles required. | Target met |
Cubic Meters of sludge and excavated material dredeged. | Valor | 0.00 | 946069.00 | 1029000.00 |
Fecha | 11 de enero de 2007 | 13 de junio de 2012 | 1 de junio de 2012 | |
Comentar | Added as part of restructuring in 2009 | Independent hydrographic survey confirmed this amount. | Target met as of last mission. Some minor dredging is still required at certain bridges. |