| Entidad De Financiamiento | Compromisos |
|---|---|
| Borrower/Recipient | 37.90 |
| Local Beneficiaries | 12.30 |
| International Bank for Reconstruction and Development | 14.70 |
Agricultural Competitiveness Project
Resumen*
The Agricultural Competitiveness Project for Kazakhstan will increase the competitiveness of the agricultural sector in Kazakhstan. To achieve this objective, the project will facilitate access to markets by supporting measures to improve the quality and safety of agricultural products, enhance access to information, and harmonize standards. The project has the following components: Component 1) will enhance the management of food safety controls... Ver Más
Objetivo de desarrollo
The projects development objective is to increase the competitiveness of the agricultural sector in Kazakhstan. To achieve this objective, the project would facilitate access to markets by supporting measures to improve the quality and safety of agricultural products, enhance access to information, and harmonize standards. It will also help to increase the quality, quantity, and relevance of applied agricultural research and facilitate transfer of knowledge to farmers.
Llave Detalles
Proyecto Detalles
P049721
Closed
Talimjan Urazov
N/A
17 de febrero de 2004
(a partir de la presentación ante el Directorio)
28 de abril de 2005
18 de septiembre de 2006
US$ 64.90 millones
N/A
2005
US$ 14.70 millones
F
15 de enero de 2013
30 de junio de 2012
BANK APPROVED
Finanzas
Financiamiento (millones de US$)
Financiamiento total del proyecto (millones de US$)
| Línea de productos | BIRF/AIF |
|---|---|
| Compromiso del BIRF | 14.70 |
| Compromiso de la AIF | No Disponible |
| Compromiso del BIRF + AIF | 14.70 |
| Instrumento de Financiamiento | |
|---|---|
| Monto a título de donación | No Disponible |
| Costo total del proyecto** | 64.90 |
Resumen del financiamiento del Banco Mundial (millones de US$) al 31 de marzo de 2025
No hay datos disponibles.
Actividad financiera detallada al 31 de marzo de 2025
No hay datos disponibles.
Ratings
CALIFICACIONES DE LA EJECUCIÓN
| Name | Review | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
| Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
| Financial Management | Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
| Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Unsatisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
| Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
| Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
| Monitoring and Evaluation | Unsatisfactory | 2012-06-24 |
CALIFICACIONES DE LA TERMINACIÓN
| INDICADOR | INFORME DE LA TERMINACIÓN DE LA EJECUCIÓN Y DE RESULTADOS: 01-31-2013 |
|---|---|
| Resultados | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Riesgo para los resultados de desarrollo | Modest |
| Desempeño del Banco | Moderately Satisfactory |
| Desempeño del prestatario | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
| Desempeño del Gobierno | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
| Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Unsatisfactory |
CALIFICACIONES DE EVALUACIONES INDEPENDIENTES
| INDICADOR | REVISIÓN DEL ICR: 02-28-2014 | INFORME DE LA EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO DEL PROYECTO: |
|---|---|---|
| Calificación De Los Resultados | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Riesgo Para Los Resultados De Desarrollo | Significant | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Banco | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Prestatario | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Desempeño Del Gobierno | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Organismo Ejecutor | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
| Calidad Del Ife | Satisfactory | N/a |
| Calidad De Sye | Negligible | N/a |
Marco de resultados
INDICADORES DE OBJETIVOS DE DESARROLLO DE PROYECTOS
| INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
|---|
Number of farmers with increased income compared with 2005 levels. Valor 0.00 3200.00 2400.00 Fecha 7 de mayo de 2009 31 de mayo de 2012 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar The estimate exceeds the final target due to a) number of grant beneficiaries (600); b) dissemination campaign that induced manyfarmers to adopt technologies developed with grants; and c) training and extension services that were financed with the project (atotal of 8,000 people benefited). Value of agricultural exports, including livestock products, rises compared with 2005. Valor 800000000.00 1670000000.00 1400000000.00 Fecha 31 de enero de 2006 31 de mayo de 2012 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Total agricultural exports in 2005: $0.8 billion Final objective achieved - Total agricultural exports in 2010 - $1.67 billion. Data for 2011 are not yet available, they will beavailable for ICR and expected to increase comparing to 2010. Total agricultural exports $1.4 billion Increased proportion of agricultural products that are tested and that meet international standards for quality and safety Valor 10.00 15.00 30.00 Fecha 31 de diciembre de 2004 31 de mayo de 2012 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Pace of increase fell short of expectations due to failure in NRL construction. Project is hiring a company to do an analysis oflaboratory testing. Better number should be available for ICR. Satisfaction of potential direct and indirect beneficiaries of the project. Percentage of surveyed beneficiaries who knows and use the project Valor 0.00 99.00 20.00 Fecha 31 de diciembre de 2004 31 de mayo de 2012 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar End of project target achieved. Almost all beneficiaries expressed high satisfaction with the project.
INDICADORES DE RESULTADOS INTERMEDIOS
| INDICATOR | LÍNEA DE REFERENCIA | EN CURSO | OBJETIVO |
|---|
Seven technical regulations, each consisting of a number of individual standards, are harmonized Valor 0.00 7.00 7.00 Fecha 31 de diciembre de 2004 31 de mayo de 2012 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar End of project target achieved. 60 laboratories are equipped according to international accreditation standards. Valor 0.00 60.00 60.00 Fecha 31 de diciembre de 2004 31 de mayo de 2012 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Equipment was delivered to all intended recipients. However, issues have been identified regarding lack of staff training, lack ofequipment calibration, underutlization of the equipment. An Action Plan to remedy the issues is being developed by the MOA. At least 140 market-oriented subprojects implemented under the CGS. Valor 0.00 86.00 140.00 Fecha 31 de diciembre de 2004 31 de mayo de 2012 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Actual number of projects turned to be less then projected due to increased actual size of the subprojects (considering inflation) 600 applied research and extension subprojects implemented under the CGS Valor 0.00 523.00 600.00 Fecha 31 de diciembre de 2004 31 de mayo de 2012 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Request for additional financing of CGS was not supported by Min Fin. Actual number of projects turned to be less then projecteddue to increased actual size of the subprojects (considering inflation) At least 40 scientists under age of 40 receive advanced education. Valor 0.00 52.00 40.00 Fecha 19 de mayo de 2005 31 de mayo de 2012 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Final target achieved Governing Board, Coordination Center, and the roster of independent peer reviewers established and operating, as demonstrated through minutes of the meetings. Valor 0.00 10.00 10.00 Fecha 31 de diciembre de 2004 31 de mayo de 2012 30 de junio de 2012 Comentar Final target achieved